#Software Gems

[quadromed]

Advancement in Cardiology Technology - Quadromed Distribution "Explore the cutting-edge innovations in cardiology technology Quadromed's advancements, revolutionizing heart care for a healthier tomorrow. Learn about groundbreaking solutions and breakthroughs in cardiac health today."

[retrocgads]

UK 1982

[reading-writing-dying]

Thinking about how we were ROBBED of Gem's facecam footage from the amongst session

[d4isywhims]

hi lovely! hope you're doing well! i love your content so much. your screenshots are always so gorgeous!

i read through your resources on how you edit and was wondering if you know where to download photoshop without it costing so much? lol <3

hi angel 🫶🏼 firstly, thank you so much for the kind words :’) SO i got photoshop 2021 for free (🏴‍☠️) from getintopc dot com :) in my opinion, it’s kind of sketchy so download at your own risk! but photoshop runs like a dream and i didn’t have to spend a single penny lol

[hua-fei-hua]

today i learned that we weebs are responsible for the existence of the .ass file type. #heritage

[highretrogamelord]

Space Mission for the ZX81

[shrews-things]

I keep a file in my notes app dedicated to documenting my little sibling's sleeptalking and you can't imagine how happy I am that I could add to it again right on the first night of being home

[retrorevelations]

Just in time for Halloween, here's my latest RR article, this time talking about what I consider to be the best of its franchise, and even the best classic First Person Shooter game of all time (outside of Goldeneye deathmatches of course), Doom 64!

[einnosyssecsgem]

Is Your OEM-Provided SECS/GEM System Falling Short in Terms of Performance or Reliability?

In the fast-paced world of semiconductor manufacturing, seamless communication between equipment and control systems is vital for achieving high operational efficiency. SECS/GEM—the Semiconductor Equipment Communication Standard and Generic Equipment Model—is the cornerstone protocol enabling this level of communication. However, many Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM)-provided SECS/GEM systems fail to deliver the performance and reliability manufacturers demand. If your current SECS/GEM system isn’t meeting expectations, it may be time to reevaluate your approach.

The Critical Role of SECS/GEM Systems

SECS/GEM serves as the backbone of equipment-to-host communication, ensuring that machines interact effectively with Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES). From automating routine processes to monitoring equipment health, SECS/GEM protocols are integral to semiconductor operations. A robust SECS/GEM

communication protocol should provide:

Real-time data exchange for actionable insights.

Seamless GEM300 compliance for advanced automation.

Reliable and efficient equipment monitoring and control.

However, many OEM-provided SECS/GEM solutions are generic by design, which can lead to limitations in customization, scalability, and performance. These limitations often manifest as delayed responses, unreliable data transfers, and restricted flexibility in adapting to specific operational needs.

Common Shortcomings of OEM SECS/GEM Systems

Limited Customization: Most OEM SECS/GEM systems are designed for general use rather than tailored for your specific manufacturing environment. This lack of customization can result in a mismatch between the system’s capabilities and your operational requirements.

Performance Issues: Generic SECS/GEM software often struggles with handling large data loads or maintaining consistent communication during peak operations. These issues can lead to unexpected downtime or operational inefficiencies.

Integration Challenges: OEM systems may lack the flexibility required for seamless SECS/GEM integration with your existing MES. This can hinder the flow of information across your manufacturing ecosystem, reducing overall productivity.

Lack of Advanced Features: Features such as predictive maintenance and comprehensive analytics—increasingly important in modern semiconductor manufacturing—are often absent or underdeveloped in OEM-provided SECS/GEM communication protocols.

Overcoming SECS/GEM System Limitations

To address these shortcomings, manufacturers can explore third-party SECS/GEM interface solutions that are specifically designed to enhance communication and operational efficiency. These systems are built with flexibility, scalability, and reliability in mind, providing an edge over standard OEM options.

Key Advantages of Upgrading Your SECS/GEM System:

Enhanced Performance: Custom SECS/GEM software solutions can handle higher data loads and deliver faster response times, ensuring reliable communication even under demanding conditions.

Greater Flexibility: Advanced SECS/GEM communication systems allow for greater customization to suit specific manufacturing needs.

Seamless GEM300 Compliance: Upgraded systems ensure adherence to GEM300 standards, facilitating advanced process automation and interoperability.

Improved Integration: Robust SECS/GEM integration capabilities simplify the connection between equipment and MES, enabling smoother operations.

Advanced Analytics: Modern SECS/GEM communication protocols often come with built-in tools for real-time data analysis and predictive maintenance, offering deeper insights into equipment performance.

Real-World Example: Transforming Operations with Upgraded SECS/GEM Systems

Consider a semiconductor manufacturer struggling with frequent communication breakdowns and operational delays due to an underperforming OEM-provided SECS/GEM system.

By deploying a custom third-party SECS/GEM communication protocol, they were able to:

Reduce downtime by 40% through reliable real-time data exchange.

Achieve seamless SECS/GEM integration with their MES, streamlining workflows.

Leverage predictive maintenance to prevent equipment failures, improving uptime.

Ensure GEM300 compliance for advanced automation capabilities.

The result? Higher operational efficiency, lower maintenance costs, and improved production yields.

If your OEM-provided SECS/GEM system is falling short in terms of performance or reliability, it’s time to explore advanced solutions. Investing in a robust SECS/GEM communication protocol tailored to your needs can significantly enhance your manufacturing capabilities. From seamless SECS/GEM integration and GEM300 compliance to predictive maintenance and real-time analytics, modern SECS/GEM systems are designed to meet the demands of today’s semiconductor industry.

Don’t let an outdated system hold you back. Upgrade your SECS/GEM interface today and unlock new levels of productivity and efficiency in your operations.

For more information on advanced SECS/GEM solutions, contact our team of experts. Let us help you achieve unparalleled performance and reliability in your manufacturing processes.

[retrocgads]

UK 1982

[thebibliosphere]

So, anyway, I say as though we are mid-conversation, and you're not just being invited into this conversation mid-thought. One of my editors phoned me today to check in with a file I'd sent over. (<3)

The conversation can be surmised as, "This feels like something you would write, but it's juuuust off enough I'm phoning to make sure this is an intentional stylistic choice you have made. Also, are you concussed/have you been taken over by the Borg because ummm."

They explained that certain sentences were very fractured and abrupt, which is not my style at all, and I was like, huh, weird... And then we went through some examples, and you know that meme going around, the "he would not fucking say that" meme?

Yeah. That's what I experienced except with myself because I would not fucking say that. Why would I break up a sentence like that? Why would I make them so short? It reads like bullet points. Wtf.

Anyway. Turns out Grammarly and Pro-Writing-Aid were having an AI war in my manuscript files, and the "suggestions" are no longer just suggestions because the AI was ignoring my "decline" every time it made a silly suggestion. (This may have been a conflict between the different software. I don't know.)

It is, to put it bluntly, a total butchery of my style and writing voice. My editor is doing surgery, removing all the unnecessary full stops and stitching my sentences back together to give them back their flow. Meanwhile, I'm over here feeling like Don Corleone, gesturing at my manuscript like:

ID: a gif of Don Corleone from the Godfather emoting despair as he says, "Look how they massacred my boy."

Fearing that it wasn't just this one manuscript, I've spent the whole night going through everything I've worked on recently, and yep. Yeeeep. Any file where I've not had the editing software turned off is a shit show. It's fine; it's all salvageable if annoying to deal with. But the reason I come to you now, on the day of my daughter's wedding, is to share this absolute gem of a fuck up with you all.

This is a sentence from a Batman fic I've been tinkering with to keep the brain weasels happy. This is what it is supposed to read as:

"It was quite the feat, considering Gotham was mostly made up of smog and tear gas."

This is what the AI changed it to:

"It was quite the feat. Considering Gotham was mostly made up. Of tear gas. And Smaug."

Absolute non-sensical sentence structure aside, SMAUG. FUCKING SMAUG. What was the AI doing? Apart from trying to write a Batman x Hobbit crossover??? Is this what happens when you force Grammarly to ignore the words "Batman Muppet threesome?"

Did I make it sentient??? Is it finally rebelling? Was Brucie Wayne being Miss Piggy and Kermit's side piece too much???? What have I wrought?

Anyway. Double-check your work. The grammar software is getting sillier every day.

[gamesearn]

Henkilökunnan rekrytointi

[tastierearranger]

Arranger Legacy | Generalmusic WX2, WX400, WX EXPANDER

Nella prima puntata di Arranger Legacy (era il 21 marzo 2022), avevamo esordito raccontandovi di GEM WS2 e del ruolo cruciale che quell’arranger aveva ricoperto nella diffusione degli strumenti con accompagnamenti fra i giovani tastieristi dell’epoca. Oggi, giunti al decimo episodio di questa rubrica corale che – come sapete – prevede l’uscita contemporanea di Riccardo Gerbi su SM Strumenti…

[highretrogamelord]

Space Mission for the ZX81

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Tech’s benevolent-dictator-for-life to authoritarian pipeline

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/12/10/bdfl/#high-on-your-own-supply

Silicon Valley's "authoritarian turn" is hard to miss: tech bosses have come out for autocrats like Trump, Orban, Milei, Bolsonaro, et al, and want to turn San Francisco into a militia-patrolled apartheid state operated for the benefit of tech bros:

https://newrepublic.com/article/180487/balaji-srinivasan-network-state-plutocrat

Smart people have written well about what this means, and have gotten me thinking, too:

https://www.programmablemutter.com/p/why-did-silicon-valley-turn-right

Regular readers will know that I make a kind of hobby of collecting definitions of right-wing thought:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/09/29/jubilance/#tolerable-racism

One of these – a hoary old cliche – is that "a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged." I don't give this one much credence, but it takes on an interesting sheen when combined with this anonymous gem: "Conservatives say they long for the simpler times of their childhood, but what they miss is that the reason they lived simpler lives back then wasn't that the times were simpler; rather, it's because they were children."

If you're a tech founder who once lived in a world where your workers were also your pals and didn't shout at you about labor relations, perhaps that's not because workers got "woke," but rather, because when you were all scrapping at a startup, you were all on an equal footing and there weren't any labor relations to speak of. And if you're a once-right-on tech founder who used to abstractly favor "social justice" but now find yourself beset by people demanding that you confront your privilege, perhaps what's changed isn't those people, but rather the amount of privilege you have.

In other words, "a reactionary tech boss is a liberal tech boss who hired a bunch of pals only to have them turn around and start a union." And also: "Tech founders say things were simpler when they were running startups, but what they miss is that the reason no one asked their startup to seriously engage with the social harms it caused is the because the startup was largely irrelevant to society, while the large company it turned into is destroying millions of peoples' lives today."

The oft-repeated reactionary excuse that "I didn't leave the progressive movement, they left me," can be both technically true and also profoundly wrong: if progressives in your circle never bothered you about your commercial affairs, perhaps that's because those affairs didn't matter when you were grinding out code in your hacker house, but they matter a lot now that you have millions of users and thousands of employees.

I've been in tech circles since before the dawn of the dotcoms; I was part of a movement of people who would come over to your house with a stack of floppies and install TCP/IP and PPP networking software on your computer and show you how to connect to a BBS or ISP, because we wanted everyone to have as much fun as we were having.

Some of us channeled that excitement into starting companies that let people get online, create digital presences of their own, and connect with other people. Some of us were more .ORG than .COM and gave our lives over to activism and nonprofits, missing out on the stock options and big paydays. But even though we ended up in different places, we mostly started in the same place, as spittle-flecked, excited kids talking a mile a minute about how cool this internet thing would be and helping you, a normie, jump into it.

Many of my peers from the .ORG and .COM worlds went on to set up institutions – both companies and nonprofits – that have since grown to be critical pieces of internet infrastructure: classified ad platforms, online encyclopedias, CMSes and personal publishing services, critical free/open source projects, standards bodies, server-to-server utilities, and more.

These all started out as benevolent autocracies: personal projects started by people who pitched in to help their virtual neighbors with the new, digital problems we were all facing. These good people, with good impulses, did good: their projects filled an important need, and grew, and grew, and became structurally important to the digital world. What started off as "Our pal's project that we all pitch in on," became, "Our pal's important mission that we help with, but that also has paid staff and important stakeholders, which they oversee as 'benevolent dictator for life.'"

Which was fine. The people who kicked off these projects had nurtured them all the way from a napkin doodle to infrastructure. They understood them better than anyone else, had sacrificed much for them, and it made sense for them to be installed as stewards.

But what they did next, how they used their powers as "BFDLs," made a huge difference. Because we are all imperfect, we are all capable of rationalizing our way into bad choices, we are all riven with insecurities that can push us to do things we later regret. When our actions are checked – by our peers' social approval or approbation; by the need to keep our volunteers happy; by the possibility of a mass exodus of our users or a fork of our code – these imperfections are balanced by consequences.

Dictators aren't necessarily any more prone to these lapses in judgment than anyone else. Benevolent dictators actually exist, people who only retain power because they genuinely want to use that power for good. Those people aren't more likely to fly off the handle or talk themselves into bad places than you or me – but to be a dictator (benevolent or otherwise) is to exist without the consequences that prevent you from giving in to those impulses. Worse: if you are the dictator – again, benevolent or otherwise – of a big, structurally important company or nonprofit that millions of people rely on, the consequences of these lapses are extremely consequential.

This is how BDFL arrangements turn sour: by removing themselves from formal constraint, the people whose screwups matter the most end up with the fewest guardrails to prevent themselves from screwing up.

No wonder people who set out to do good, to help others find safe and satisfying digital homes online, find themselves feeling furious and beset. Given those feelings, can we really be surprised when "benevolent" dictators discover that they have sympathy for real-world autocrats whose core ethos is, "I know what needs to be done and I could do it, if only the rest of you would stop nagging me about petty bullshit that you just made up 10 minutes ago but now insist is the most important thing in the world?"

That all said, it's interesting to look at the process by which some BDFLs transitioned to community-run projects with checks and balances. I often think about how Wikipedia's BDFL, the self-avowed libertarian Jimmy Wales, decided (correctly, and to his everlasting credit), that the project he raised from a weird idea into a world-historic phenomenon should not be ruled over by one guy, not even him.

(Jimmy is one of those libertarians who believes that we don't need governments to make us be kind and take care of one another because he is kind and takes care of other people – see also John Gilmore and Penn Jillette:)

https://www.cracked.com/article_40871_penn-jillette-wants-to-talk-it-all-out.html

Jimmy's handover to the Wikimedia Foundation gives me hope for our other BDFLs. He's proof that you can find yourself in the hotseat without being so overwhelmed with personal grievance that you find yourself in sympathy with actual fascists, but rather, have the maturity and self-awareness to know that the reason people are demanding so much of you is that you have – deliberately and with great effort – created a situation in which you owe the world a superhuman degree of care and attention, and the only way to resolve that situation equitably and secure your own posterity is to share that power around, not demand that you be allowed to wield it without reproach.

[aspenscore]

Author: Aspenscore

Title: A Mania Of Joels

Creative Commons License: A Mania Of Joels © 2025 by Aspenscore is licensed under CC BY 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Size: 384x512

(Really hoping the March 15 deadline includes March 15. I'm posting this before midnight on March 14 in my timezone, but it is already March 15 for Joel.)

Process TL;DR:

I've decided a group of Joels is called a mania.

My favourite part of Joel's season has been his many characters, as well as the Hermit Baths On Hermitcraft podcast, so I decided to combine those two things in this drawing.

This piece started as a bunch of sketches at work and took me about 20 hours to draw, plus an additional 8 hours fighting tech issues (including a crash that lost me the completed drawing (luckily I took this screenshot just before)).

Despite my struggles with that + screen rec software, there'll be a timelapse video of my drawing process coming soon on my channel!

Re: the title, I've decided a group of Joels is called a "mania" (like how a group of horses, for example, is a "herd").

One of my favourite things about Joel's season are all the fun intros and characters he's created, which inspired me to create something that showcases some of the main Joels we've met so far. I also really like the Hermit Baths On Hermitcraft (Another Podcast Hosted By A Straight White Male), so I figured the bathhouse would be the perfect place for a mania of Joels! I would've loved to include all the Joels, but by my count, there are at least 26 distinct Joels in this season so far, which is far too many Joels for me to fit in one image (and several of them are hard to distinguish based on appearance alone).

Since I could only include so many, I tried to choose Joels who are either recurring characters, or relevant to other things Joel has done in his videos. With that in mind, on this episode of Hermit Baths On Hermitcraft we've got Joel Who Asks You To Subscribe, News Reporter Joel, Bad Boy Joel (the statue counts as being in the season imo), Bartender (Horse Killer? :0) Joel, Officer Joel (RIP Detective Joel, would've loved to include him but it wouldn't be lore-accurate for him to be alive), Joel Who Totally Isn't Obsessed With Etho, Frogger Joel, Podcast Host Joel, and Singer Joel.

A few details I wanted to highlight:

News Reporter Joel always has a headline scroll bar with him. He doesn't know how or why. It's just there.

Joel Who Totally Isn't Obsessed With Etho not only has the Etho shirt on, but he's also in etho cosplay (headband) and has Etho face floaties (no idea where that came from but once I'd thought it I couldn't un-think it).

I'm most proud of Frogger Joel's outfit. He's got a froggy hat, frog crop top, lilypad shorts, and frog shoes with lilypad tops.

Singer Joel's kimono was originally going to have a pattern of symbols relating to Joel's season, but then I realized those wouldn't show up very well with the lowered resolution. The planned symbols included music discs, xp bottles, axolotls, slime balls, honeycomb, frogs, horses, glow squid, and glow berries.

Podcast Host Joel's abs are drawn on. Gem said it so it's canon.

Bartender Joel's vest is the same colour and pattern as that horse head...

And now for the process! I know a lot of you probably aren't that interested in it, but I spent a lot of time on this so I'd at least like to record my efforts.

This piece actually started on paper, because I work a lot and I knew I wouldn't have time to do the whole piece if I didn't at least do some advance planning during down time at my job. However, all I had at work was some scrap paper and a pencil (I couldn't even find an eraser the day I started this!), so I needed to find some way to get the aspect ratio correct without a ruler. While there were no rulers at work, I was able to find some mini origami paper, and since that's a perfect square, I was able to use it to replicate the sizing I'd chosen. I sketched out the general background layout, used two of those lines + the edge of another piece of paper to determine the vanishing point, then re-drew the rest of the background according to the point I'd determined. These techniques worked shockingly well, and when I scanned the drawing and checked my measurements in my drawing program, they were surprisingly accurate!

With the scan uploaded, along with a page of outfit design sketches I had also done at work, I ran into my next hurdle: screen recording software. To keep a long and agonizing story short, I draw on an old tablet that has very little storage, RAM, or processing power, so OBS + my drawing program were not an option. The drawing program itself doesn't have a timelapse feature either, so I had to go find another piece of software that would meet my needs. I even tried using my tablet as a third screen for my PC, which could absolutely handle the processing and storage needs of this project, but the latency was far too high for that to be a feasible option. Trying all of these options took at least 8 hours and at one point had the side effect of permanently messing up something on my main PC monitor that causes it to reset all its settings periodically (if anyone has any idea what's going on with that, I'd love to not have to re-do my settings every couple minutes or so).

My tablet's limited storage also resulted in me almost losing a portion of my footage, but you can rest assured that I've managed to save all of it, and if it's useable I will be editing it down into a timelapse + process video to upload to my channel! The video will probably include a lot of the information here, but hopefully it'll be a bit more interesting and engaging! (I was originally going to link the video here instead of writing all these paragraphs, but the drawing took so long I haven't had time to make the video).

Finally, after spending basically all of my free time at home during the past two weeks working on this drawing, I finished it just a couple hours ago.

I hit save.

And got an error message.

Storage issue.

Since the image resolution is intended to be reduced anyway (for minecraft painting, but also just how tumblr treats images), I grabbed a screenshot of the finished piece before my tablet crashed and rebooted. It saved some of my work, but not all of it, so this is now the only complete version of the piece in existence.

At the end of the day, I'm just glad I finished it on time and am happy with the final product. If you've read this far, thank you so much for your patience with my rambling, I hope you enjoy the final piece as much as I do. And thank you to Joel for creating such fun videos and awesome builds! I look forward to the rest of your first Hermitcraft season.